|
Grievance
Procedure
The grievance
procedure for the School provides means whereby any member of its faculty
or academic professional staff who believes him or herself to be aggrieved
can obtain consideration of redress of this grievance.
These procedures have
been developed to conform to the Guidelines
for College-Level Academic Grievance Procedures adopted by the Executive
Committee of the Board of Trustees on March 13, 1975.
Coverage
(1) Academic
grievance procedures are applicable to those persons holding appointments
as Professor, Associate Professor, Assistant Professor, Visiting Professor
(all ranks), Adjunct Professor (all ranks), Instructor, Senior Lecturer,
Lecturer, Senior Research Associate, Research Associate, Senior Extension
Associate, Extension Associate or Postdoctoral Associate. Persons
holding these appointments are hereinafter referred to as Academic Staff.
(2) Academic
grievance procedures are not applicable to degree candidates having
appointments such as Teaching Assistant, Research Assistant, Extension
Assistant or Graduate Research Assistant, for whom a special procedure
exists.
(3) Academic
grievance procedures for Librarians, Associate Librarians or Assistant
Librarians in the School will normally proceed through the Cornell University
Libraries grievance procedures.
(4) An individual
(or individuals) who, by his or her appointment, is covered by more
than one college or University Grievance Procedure, may choose the procedure
under which he or she wishes to protest a particular grievance.
An individual (or individuals) may not, however, initiate more than
one grievance procedure for the same grievance.
top
of page
Fundamental
Precepts Governing Grievance Proceedings
The individual (or
individuals) submitting a grievance (the griever), the individual (or
individuals) against whom the injustice or harm is alleged (the respondent),
witnesses, individuals giving depositions, members of the Grievance Committee,
the Dean of the School and all other parties involved will be governed
by the following precepts in the conduct of grievance proceedings:
(1) The griever
bears the burden of proof required to sustain the grievance.
(2) Precepts
of fairness shall govern all proceedings.
(3) The griever and the respondent may be represented by persons (including
legal counsel) of their own choice for the purpose of providing counsel
and conducting cross-examination. The Grievance Committee shall
have the right to limit representatives and counsel to a reasonable
number. If the griever wishes to retain a representative or counsel,
he or she shall bear the expense of such representation. If the
griever is represented by another individual from the University, such
representative will be allowed reasonable time to perform his or her
function without loss of pay.
(4) If
either the griever or the respondent elects to have legal counsel, the
Grievance Committee should consult with University Counsel about the
advisability of retaining legal counsel on behalf of the Grievance Committee.
(5) Except
on the basis of clear need-to-know, all proceedings of the Grievance
Committee shall be held strictly confidential by all parties involved.
Where questions arise covering confidentiality and need-to-know, the
Grievance Committee is empowered to make binding rulings.
(6) Privileged
or confidential information cannot be divulged or made available by
reason of a grievance proceeding that would not otherwise be made available.
For example, a grievance involving salary does not entitle the individual
asserting the grievance to confidential information about the individual
salaries of his or her fellow academicians. In the event that
dispute arises over whether information is or is not confidential and
privileged, options for providing the information should be explored.
The following options are deemed not to break the promise of confidentiality:
(a) Under
injunction of confidentiality, Grievance Committee members may be
provided with confidential information;
(b) Written
information, modified to exclude names and identifying material, may
be submitted in evidence; and
(c) An
individual who provided information on a confidential basis may authorize
its release. Where a group of individuals such as a committee
has provided information on a confidential basis, it may authorize
its release only on a unanimous basis.
An individual possessing
confidential information will be the final judge as to whether he or
she should release it. The individuals decision shall not,
however, bind the decision of other individuals who may possess the
same confidential information.
(7) At any
time during a grievance proceeding, the griever may withdraw the complaint.
Notification of withdrawal must be made in writing to the respondent,
members of the Grievance Committee and the Dean of the School.
Once withdrawn, the same grievance cannot, under any circumstances,
be reasserted. All parties will follow Preservation of Records
(Section 1.8).
top
of page
Grievable
Action
(1) A grievance
is defined as an injustice or harm arising from a specific situation
involving an act or acts of alleged unfairness which the individual
regards as just cause for protest on his or her own behalf. Grievable
actions may grow out of a number of separate or related aspects of an
individuals responsibilities, of which the following are illustrative
but not limiting:
(a) Salaries
and other benefits;
(b) Academic
freedom;
(c) Work
conditions;
(d) Discrimination
by race, creed, sex or age;
(e) Task
assignments; and
(f) Existence
of, adequacy of and adherence to equitable grievance procedures.
(2) With
the exception noted in Section 1.3 below, this academic grievance procedure
can be applied to the substantive and/or procedural aspects of any grievance
arising out of the academicians execution of his or her designated
responsibilities.
(3) This
academic grievance procedure does not apply to matters of appointment,
reappointment, promotion or tenure. Review of these matters is
covered by a separate procedure.
top
of page
Grievance
Proceedings, Institution of
(1) In
case the individual (or individuals) is dissatisfied after following
the pre-grievance procedures outlined in Section 1.6, a written grievance,
stating the basis for the grievance and summarizing the attempts to
resolve the dispute, may be presented to the Chairperson of the Johnson
Schools Faculty Policy Committee within ten (10) days following
the conference with the Dean.
(2) An Ad
Hoc Grievance Committee to consider the grievance shall be constituted
with the aid of the Chairperson of the Faculty Policy Committee and
shall consist of three (3) members:
(a) One
(1) member from the Academic Staff of the School chosen by
the aggrieved individual;
(b) One
(1) member from the Academic Staff of the School chosen by
the Dean of the School; and
(c) One (1) member from the Academic Staff of the University chosen
by the above two (2) designated committee members.
The third member
chosen by this procedure shall be the Chairperson of the Ad Hoc Grievance
Committee. If agreement on the third committee member cannot be
reached in fifteen (15) days, the third member shall be chosen by the
Faculty Policy Committee of the School within the next seven (7) days.
Notwithstanding the above method of selecting members of the Ad Hoc
Grievance Committee, no individual can serve as a member who is also
a directly affected party to the grievance at issue. In case of
dispute, the Faculty Policy Committee shall determine who is a directly
affected party.
top
of page
Hearings
(1) The
Grievance Committee will set the time and place of all hearings.
Written notice will be given to all parties at least forty-eight (48)
hours in advance of all hearings.
(2) During
hearings, all members of the Grievance Committee will be present.
Decisions on all matters coming before the three member Grievance Committee
will be by majority vote.
(3) In
any situation where the rules and procedures described herein do not
apply, Roberts Rules of Order will guide the Grievance
Committee. By majority vote, the Grievance Committee shall be
sole and final arbiter of all procedural questions that arise during
hearings.
(4) Hearings
shall be conducted with relative informality and the normal rules of
evidence applied in judicial proceedings may not necessarily be strictly
observed.
(5) The
griever, the respondent and their respective representatives will be
brought before the Committee simultaneously. They will be permitted
to remain throughout the hearing until the Committee begins its deliberations.
No other individuals are allowed to be present at the hearing.
Witnesses may be called by either party or at the Committees request,
but will appear only when called to testify and will withdraw immediately
after testifying.
(6) Since
he or she bears the burden of proof, the griever will have the opportunity
to present his or her case first. The respondent will then have
the opportunity to present his or her case.
(7) Both
griever and respondent will have the opportunity to make a reasonable
cross-examination of witnesses presented by the opposing party.
If the griever or respondent testifies on his or her own behalf, he
or she shall be subject to reasonable cross-examination. All members
of the Grievance Committee may question all witnesses who appear before
the Committee.
(8) The
griever and respondent need not present themselves as witnesses if they
choose not to do so. No unfavorable inferences shall be drawn
from a decision not to appear as a witness.
(9) In
lieu of appearing as a witness, any individual may submit a written
statement to the Grievance Committee. Written statements will
not be subject to cross-examination and the weight given thereto by
the Grievance Committee will be judged accordingly.
(10) A
representative of either griever or respondent may give testimony as
a witness and, after such testimony, be subject to cross-examination.
As a general rule, a representative, having testified, may not thereafter,
except in unusual circumstances, give testimony as a witness.
Exceptions to this rule will be made at the absolute discretion of the
Committee and only where the ends of justice require such a variance
in procedure.
(11) All
testimony and questioning will be kept germane to the issues involved
and will not be repetitive, argumentative or provocative. The
Chairperson will rule on all questions of the propriety of any testimony
or questions in accordance with precepts of fairness and due process.
The decision of the Chairperson shall be final, subject only to appeal
to the entire Committee.
(12) On conclusion
of the testimony, the griever and representative and the respondent
and representative shall, in that order, have the opportunity to give
a brief recapitulation of their positions and the issues that they see
in dispute.
(13) The
griever and respondent shall be afforded the opportunity to file a written
brief setting forth their positions. Notice of intent to file
such a brief must be given to the Chairperson prior to the close of
the hearing. Such briefs must be submitted to the Chairperson
within five (5) days after close of the hearing.
(14) All
testimony at hearings shall be recorded. Such recordings shall
be kept and used only by the Grievance Committee in its deliberations
or, on appeal, by the Faculty Committee on Academic Freedom and Responsibilities
(or such Committees designate).
(15) Upon
conclusion of the hearing and receipt of such briefs as may be tendered,
the Grievance Committee will conduct its deliberations in private.
(16) The
findings and recommendations of the Grievance Committee shall be communicated
in writing to the griever, the respondent and to the Dean of the School
within fifteen (15) days of conclusion of hearings.
top
of page
Pre-Grievance
Procedures
An individual (or
individuals) who believes an action or actions covered in Section 1.3
taken by the School, and/or the University, makes the effective execution
of the individuals responsibilities intolerable, should discuss
the action (or actions) with the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs.
In negotiating, the parties involved should remember that the purpose
of this grievance procedure is to resolve differences, where possible,
on a basis mutually acceptable to all parties. If the disputed action
is not satisfactorily resolved as a result of such discussion, the individual
(or individuals) should discuss the problem with the Dean of the School.
top
of page
Pre-Hearing
Review
1) Upon
constitution, the Grievance Committee shall conduct a pre-hearing review
of the alleged grievance to determine:
(a) Whether
or not direct negotiation remedies (described in Section 1.6) have,
in fact, been exhausted; and
(b) Whether
or not facts warrant consideration on the substantive and/or procedural
aspects of the issue, a detailed investigation, hearings, recommendations
and decisions.
(2) In
conducting the pre-hearing review, the Grievance Committee shall be
provided with the written statement of the griever. As it deems
necessary in order to establish essential facts and unresolved issues,
the Grievance Committee may request written statements from the respondent
and from such other individuals as it considers appropriate in the circumstances.
(3) If
the Grievance Committee determines that negotiating remedies have not
been exhausted, it may return the grievance for further negotiation.
It should also take such actions as are feasible to foster further negotiations.
If the grievance is not resolved by these procedures, the grievance
will proceed in the manner set forth in Section 1.4.
(4) The
findings of the Grievance Committees pre-hearing review shall
be communicated in writing to the griever, the respondent and to the
Dean of the School within fifteen (15) days of the constitution of the
Grievance Committee. As set forth above, possible findings include:
(a) Remanding
for further negotiation;
(b) Dismissing
for lack of merit; or
(c) Proceeding
to hearings.
If the finding involves
dismissal for lack of merit, Sections 1.8 through 1.11 will be followed
as applicable.
top
of page
Preservation
of Records
(1) If
a review is not requested, the recordings of hearings and all other
material submitted in evidence and in the possession of the Grievance
Committee will be erased or otherwise destroyed by the Grievance Committee,
so as to preserve confidentiality.
(2) If a
review is requested, the Grievance Committee will make available to
the Faculty Committee on Academic Freedom and Responsibility recordings
of the hearings and all other material submitted in evidence and in
the possession of the Committee.
(3) With
the exception of the Grievance Committee, all parties to a grievance
proceeding may preserve the written records that are made available
to them during the course of the grievance proceeding. Such retention
does not relieve any party of the responsibility to maintain confidentiality
on a need-to-know basis.
top
of page
Review
Any of the principal
parties to a grievance that have proceeded through to decision by the
Dean may request a review of that decision in accordance with the procedures
of the Faculty Committee on Academic Freedom and Responsibilities.
Such request must be submitted in writing to the Provost with copies to
other principal parties, the Dean of the School and to the Dean of the
University Faculty within ten (10) days after the Dean reports an acceptance
or rejection of the Grievance Committee recommendations.
top
of page
Right
to Grievable Action
The individual academician
has the right as a condition of his or her appointment to seek through
these formal grievance procedures, involving the judgment of the individuals
peers, a redress of decisions made and/or actions taken at the Program,
School and/or University level, that the individual considers intolerable
to the effective execution of his or her responsibilities. The right
to initiate a formal grievance action does not extend to circumventing
or impairing the normal decision-making processes. The desire to
anticipate or register unhappiness over a particular decision or action
does not justify initiating a grievance procedure. Only when direct
negotiations between parties to a dispute have been exhausted and have
not led to a resolution, may individuals resort to invoking the academic
grievance procedure of the School.
top
of page
Subsequent
Action
(1) The
findings and recommendations resulting from the grievance procedure
described herein are advisory to the Dean of the School and to the President
and Trustees of the University. While a prior academic decision
may be reviewed, modified or affected as a consequence of a grievance
proceeding, the proceeding itself shall not effect that change.
(2) On
receipt of the report of the Ad Hoc Grievance Committee, the Dean of
the School may or may not accept the act in accordance with its recommendations.
In either case, the Dean shall, within ten (10) days, communicate in
writing the decisions and proposed actions to the griever, respondent,
Provost and Dean of the University Faculty. If the Dean of the
School rejects recommendations of the Grievance Committee, the reasons
for doing so shall be set forth in his or her report.
(3) Within
five (5) days after the Dean reports on acceptance or rejection of Grievance
Committee recommendations, the griever, the respondent or the Dean may
request the Grievance Committee to prepare a summary report on the nature
of the grievance and its resolution, for issuance to the Academic Staff
of the School. At its discretion, the Grievance Committee may
accept or reject such requests.
If such a request
is denied, the nature of the case and its resolution shall remain confidential
on a need-to-know basis.
For information on Academic Grievance Procedures, go to the University Faculty's web site at http://web.cornell.edu/UniversityFaculty/. In the red box on the left, click on "Academic Policies" and click on the relevant "Faculty Appeals Procedures" for:
top
of page


(printer-friendly
version)
Last Modified: May 13, 2008
|